Property (2005-2006)
I. ACQUISITION
- Capture
- First in Time [Pierson v. Post]
- Majority - First to capture
- Minority - First "reasonable prospect"
- When custom establishes procedures for settling disputes, use custom. [Ghen v. Rich]
- Constructive Possession - A wild animal that frequents a property is part of that property by animus revertendi, and one who chases it off is maliciously interfering with trade. [Keeble v. Hickeringill]
- Rule of Increase - Possession of the offspring belongs to whoever owns the mother.
- Demsetz
- Externalities
- Tragedy of the commons – Nobody has an exclusive right.
- Tragedy of the anti-commons - Everyone has an exclusive right to common property.
- Freeriding problem
- Transaction costs
- Bundle of rights
- First in Time [Pierson v. Post]
- Creation
-
Physical Property
- Property in one’s person [Moore v. Regents – Plaintiff has no property right in his excised body part] Intellectual Property
- Trademark
- Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) – Cybersquatter is liable to owner of a protected mark if that person had a bad faith intent to profit from that mark. [Virtual Works v. Volkswagen]
- Celebrity "right of publicity" (widely recognized) – Property interest, assignable during life, descendible at death. Posner: Rooted in right of privacy.
- Patents
- 35 U.S.C. § 101 - Inventions patentable: Any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof.
- Chemical extracts – Process for purifying naturally occurring chemical, as well as purified chemical, both patentable. [Parke-Davis (1911)]
- Laws of nature – Mathematical formulae not patentable; implementing or applying a formula in a process otherwise patentable is protected. [Diehr]
- Composition of matter – Simply rearranging bacteria is not patentable. [Funk Bros.]
- Living things are not patentable. [Chakrabarty – Process for producing and for disseminating bacteria is patentable; bacteria themselves are not.]
- Copyright
-
Subject Matter
- Originality
- Independent
- Modicum of creativity
- Facts are not copyrightable; compilations of facts may be, if presented in an original way. [Feist v. Rural – Phone book not original compilation.]
- Ideas are not copyrightable. [Baker v. Selden – Text on bookkeeping methods not copyrightable.]
- Subject matter with limited forms of expression not copyrightable. [Morrissey – Sweepstakes rules]
- Where form and function inseparable, no copyright. [Brandir v. Cascade – Bike rack as minimalist art] Imitation
- News is not copyrightable; but there is quasi-property interest in gathered news, so interference where business profits from transmission constitutes unfair competition. [International News Service v. AP]
- Copyright gives right to exclude others from enjoyment, but not imitation. Right to exclude imitation is monopoly. [Cheney Brothers – Imitation of silk patterns okay.]
- Baird – Balance right to information and promotion of market economy.
- Originality
No comments:
Post a Comment