Criminal Law (2005 Fall)
XI. TRIAL PROCESS
- Evidence
- Evidence that is relevant is admissible only if it is:
- Probative
- Material
- Evidence that is relevant but inadmissible
- Privilege
- Patient/doctor
- Attorney/client
- Priest/penitent
- Spouse
- Self-incrimination
- Hearsay [Krulewitch – Prostitution conspiracy]
- Prejudice [Zackowitz – Character evidence inadmissible unless defense makes character an issue; psychological profiles or reputations in rape cases.]
- Privilege
- Evidence that is relevant but limited in admissibility
- Rule 404(b) – Evidence of prior crimes may be used for proof of motive, opportunity, intent, etc., but not for establishing character.
- Signature exception – Where prior crimes establish a “signature”, preponderance of evidence is sufficient.
- Sex offenses – Evidence of prior offense admissible unless prejudicial.
- Impeachment – If defense makes character an issue, character evidence admissible.
- Evidence that is relevant is admissible only if it is:
- Burden of Proof
- Reasonable doubt
- Preponderance for affirmative defense
- Allocation
- Normally state bears burden of production (putting an issue in play) and burden of persuasion (convincing the trier of fact).
- State may not shift burdens to defendant by making an element’s converse an affirmative defense. [Patterson/Mullaney]
- Presumptions
- Conclusive [Sandstrom – Conclusive not okay]
- Mandatory
- Permissible
- Rebuttable
- Role of Counsel
-
Perjury
Nix v. Whiteside – If defendant wants to commit perjury, counsel must choose between free narrative, and thread of disclosure.
- Impeachment of prosecution witnesses
-
No comments:
Post a Comment