The California Supreme Court seems now to be saying that blowing a 0.08 is not enough in itself to warrant a DUI arrest. This is nothing new to DUI lawyers, of course.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A place for thoughts from law classes, and for commentaries on the issues of our day.
About Me
Outlines
Law Law Links
- Above the Law
- Cameron's Blog
- Empirical Legal Studies
- Esq. Never
- FormosanWonderBoy
- Groatian Moment Blog
- Instapundit
- Law Blog
- Law X.0
- Los Angeles Bankruptcy Law Monitor
- Lowering the Bar
- Loyola Law School
- Opinio Juris
- Overbreadth
- Raymond Nimmer's IP Blog
- SCOTUSblog
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- The Food Page
- The LACBA Student Lounge Blog
- The Penetrating Armenian
- The Rhetorican
- The TTABlog
- The Truth Laid Bear
- United States Patent and Trademark Office
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(53)
-
▼
July
(13)
- California Supreme Court: Breathalyzer Test Not E...
- Outline: Contracts - X - Damages (Legal Remedy)
- Outline: Contracts - IX - Specific Performance (Eq...
- Outline: Contracts - VIII - Termination and Rescis...
- Outline: Contracts - VII - Unenforceability
- Outline: Contracts - VI - Parol Evidence Rule
- Outline: Contracts - V - Statute of Frauds
- Outline: Contracts - IV - Express and Implied Prom...
- Outline: Contracts - III - Modifications and Mutua...
- Outline: Contracts - II - Contract Formation
- Outline: Contracts - I - Basics
- Outline: Contracts
- Copyright vs. Freedom of Expression
-
▼
July
(13)
Copyright © 2005-2009 Law Law Stud
1 comment:
Thanks a lot for the info and keeping this blog updated (it's not easy, I know).
Lots of useful information for a 1L like myself.I especially like your outlines, they helped give me ideas for formats to use.
Post a Comment